Patorno v. Schillaci

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Patorno v. Schillaci

313 So. 2d 599, 1975 La. LEXIS 3663

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 13, 1975

DocketNo. 56294

StatusPublished

This text of 313 So. 2d 599 (Patorno v. Schillaci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patorno v. Schillaci, 313 So. 2d 599, 1975 La. LEXIS 3663 (La. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Ursula Patorno Schillaci, applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 310 So.2d 179.

Writ denied. On the facts found by Court of Appeal result is correct.

TATE, J., dissents, being of the opinion that the denial of a separation on the ground of mutual fault is an illogical doctrine — mutual fault is all the more reason to grant both parties a separation. The legislature never established this doctrine. Being judicially created, the doctrine is subject to judicial re-evaluation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Ursula Patorno Schillaci, applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 310 So.2d 179.

Writ denied. On the facts found by Court of Appeal result is correct.

TATE, J., dissents, being of the opinion that the denial of a separation on the ground of mutual fault is an illogical doctrine — mutual fault is all the more reason to grant both parties a separation. The legislature never established this doctrine. Being judicially created, the doctrine is subject to judicial re-evaluation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

313 So. 2d 599, 1975 La. LEXIS 3663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patorno-v-schillaci-la-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack