Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R.

California Supreme Court

Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R.

52 Cal. 90

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1877

DocketNo. 4935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 Cal. 90 (Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R., 52 Cal. 90 (Cal. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

The verdict, in so far as it awarded damages “in United States gold coin,” was unwarranted, and this clause should have [91]*91been disregarded in entering the judgment. ( Watson v. S. F. & H. B. R. R. Co. 50 Cal. 523.) We find no other error in the record.

Judgment and order affirmed, except in so far as the judgment requires payment in gold coin, and the case is remanded, with instructions to the Court below to modify the judgment in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

The verdict, in so far as it awarded damages “in United States gold coin,” was unwarranted, and this clause should have [91]*91been disregarded in entering the judgment. ( Watson v. S. F. & H. B. R. R. Co. 50 Cal. 523.) We find no other error in the record.

Judgment and order affirmed, except in so far as the judgment requires payment in gold coin, and the case is remanded, with instructions to the Court below to modify the judgment in accordance with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Cal. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patochi-v-cent-pac-rr-cal-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack