Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R.

California Supreme Court

Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R.

52 Cal. 90

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1877·No. No. 4935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

The verdict, in so far as it awarded damages “in United States gold coin,” was unwarranted, and this clause should have [91]*91been disregarded in entering the judgment. ( Watson v. S. F. & H. B. R. R. Co. 50 Cal. 523.) We find no other error in the record.

Judgment and order affirmed, except in so far as the judgment requires payment in gold coin, and the case is remanded, with instructions to the Court below to modify the judgment in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

The verdict, in so far as it awarded damages “in United States gold coin,” was unwarranted, and this clause should have [91]*91been disregarded in entering the judgment. ( Watson v. S. F. & H. B. R. R. Co. 50 Cal. 523.) We find no other error in the record.

Judgment and order affirmed, except in so far as the judgment requires payment in gold coin, and the case is remanded, with instructions to the Court below to modify the judgment in accordance with this opinion.

Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R., 52 Cal. 90 (Cal. 1877).

Pincite

52 Cal. 90 (Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related