Patino v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Patino v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese

53 A.D.2d 571, 385 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13197

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 1976·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 26, 1975, in favor of defendants on jury verdict is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The evidence, particularly that as to the condition of the traffic signal lights, presented questions of fact as to whether defendant McGill was negligent and as to whether plaintiff was contributorily negligent. The jury resolved those questions in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs, and there is no basis for interfering with the verdict. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Silverman and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 26, 1975, in favor of defendants on jury verdict is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The evidence, particularly that as to the condition of the traffic signal lights, presented questions of fact as to whether defendant McGill was negligent and as to whether plaintiff was contributorily negligent. The jury resolved those questions in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs, and there is no basis for interfering with the verdict. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Silverman and Lane, JJ.

Patino v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese, 53 A.D.2d 571, 385 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

53 A.D.2d 571 (Patino v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.