Patin v. Naba

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Patin v. Naba

8 Mart. (N.S.) 113

DecidedMay 15, 1829

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Mart. (N.S.) 113 (Patin v. Naba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patin v. Naba, 8 Mart. (N.S.) 113 (La. 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion, of the court. This is an action in redhibition. The general issue is pleaded. The court below gave judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

An examination of the evidence has convinced us, that the judge of the first instance has not erred. The proof does not establish the existence of the disease, at the time the plaintiff purchased.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and de[114]*114creed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed with costs.

Trabuc for the plaintiff—Canon for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion, of the court. This is an action in redhibition. The general issue is pleaded. The court below gave judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

An examination of the evidence has convinced us, that the judge of the first instance has not erred. The proof does not establish the existence of the disease, at the time the plaintiff purchased.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and de[114]*114creed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed with costs.

Trabuc for the plaintiff—Canon for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Mart. (N.S.) 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patin-v-naba-la-1829.