Patillo v. Hallet & Davis Piano Co.

106 S.E. 206, 26 Ga. App. 327, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 131
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 24, 1921
Docket11308
StatusPublished

This text of 106 S.E. 206 (Patillo v. Hallet & Davis Piano Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patillo v. Hallet & Davis Piano Co., 106 S.E. 206, 26 Ga. App. 327, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 131 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. A blank indorsement of the payee of a mortgage-note is sufficient to pass the legal title in the note and mortgage to the holder thereof, and the mortgage may be foreclosed by the holder in his own name. Civil Code (1910), §§ 3278, 3345, 3346, 3347, 4274; Seize v. First National Bank of Pensacola, 140 Ga. 603 (79 S. E. 540).

2. The plea of failure of consideration not being stricken, and it not appearing what evidence, if any, was offered by the defendant in support of such plea, an assignment of error that “the defendant had a legal right to plead failure of consideration ” is without merit.

3. The verdict for the plaintiff was properly directed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Hill, J., eoncw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Setze v. First National Bank
79 S.E. 540 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.E. 206, 26 Ga. App. 327, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patillo-v-hallet-davis-piano-co-gactapp-1921.