Pathe Exchange v. Court of Common Pleas of Hudson Cty
131 A. 870, 102 N.J.L. 443, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 193
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — ISTone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pathe Exchange v. Court of Common Pleas of Hudson Cty, 131 A. 870, 102 N.J.L. 443, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 193 (N.J. 1926).
131 A. 870 (Pathe Exchange v. Court of Common Pleas of Hudson Cty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Devins v. Borough of Bogota
592 A.2d 199 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1991)
Dorfman v. Barnett
48 A.2d 217 (Atlantic County Circuit Court, N.J., 1946)
Sunshine Park, Inc. v. Gulvin
33 A.2d 704 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943)
Miller v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, Inc.
187 A. 332 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)