Path v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

84 N.Y.S. 1138
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 18, 1903·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The verdict is attacked on the ground that it is against the weight of evidence. Upon a review of the whole case we can find no sufficient reason for disturbing it, especially as no motion was made for the direction of a verdict. The defendant’s exception to the admission of evidence does not present reversible error. Judgment and o.rder affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Path v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 84 N.Y.S. 1138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

84 N.Y.S. 1138 (Path v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.