Paterson v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.
11 S.E. 872, 85 Ga. 653, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 126
Opinion
The plaintiff in error brought his action against the defendant in error, and upon demurrer to the declaration the court sustained the demurrer ; whereupon the plaintiff, Paterson, excepted and says this was error. The injury complained of by the plaintiff in error was caused by his own fault or negligence, and not by the fault or negligence of the company. So we think the court committed no error in sustaining the demurrer in this case. Judgment-affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paterson v. Central Railroad & Banking Co., 11 S.E. 872, 85 Ga. 653, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 126 (Ga. 1890).
11 S.E. 872 (Paterson v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Talbert v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.
81 S.E. 182 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1914)
Southern Railway Co. v. Nappier
74 S.E. 778 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Pierce v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
72 S.E. 66 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Southern Railway Co. v. Strickland
61 S.E. 826 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Augusta Southern Railroad v. Snider
44 S.E. 1005 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Leftwich
117 F. 127 (Eighth Circuit, 1902)
Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Myers
80 F. 361 (Eighth Circuit, 1897)
Cleveland, Etc., Railway Co. v. Moneyhun
34 L.R.A. 141 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)
Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Paterson
13 S.E. 525 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)