Paterson v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Paterson v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.

11 S.E. 872, 85 Ga. 653, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 126

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 7, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 11 S.E. 872 (Paterson v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paterson v. Central Railroad & Banking Co., 11 S.E. 872, 85 Ga. 653, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 126 (Ga. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

The plaintiff in error brought his action against the defendant in error, and upon demurrer to the declaration the court sustained the demurrer ; whereupon the plaintiff, Paterson, excepted and says this was error. The injury complained of by the plaintiff in error was caused by his own fault or negligence, and not by the fault or negligence of the company. So we think the court committed no error in sustaining the demurrer in this case. Judgment-affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blandford, Justice.

The plaintiff in error brought his action against the defendant in error, and upon demurrer to the declaration the court sustained the demurrer ; whereupon the plaintiff, Paterson, excepted and says this was error. The injury complained of by the plaintiff in error was caused by his own fault or negligence, and not by the fault or negligence of the company. So we think the court committed no error in sustaining the demurrer in this case. Judgment-affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 S.E. 872, 85 Ga. 653, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paterson-v-central-railroad-banking-co-ga-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack