Paterson & Ramapo Railroad v. Mayor of Paterson

60 A. 47, 72 N.J.L. 112, 1905 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 118
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 27, 1905
StatusPublished

This text of 60 A. 47 (Paterson & Ramapo Railroad v. Mayor of Paterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paterson & Ramapo Railroad v. Mayor of Paterson, 60 A. 47, 72 N.J.L. 112, 1905 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 118 (N.J. 1905).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

The evidence in this case satisfies us that the point at which the proposed street crosses the railroad tracks is, properly speaking, a freight yard. There are side tracks, cars are unloaded and trains made up at this point, and it is used as a storing yard. All the tracks have been there and the present use has been continued for twenty-three years. That the city of Paterson has no authority to lay out a street across the freight yard of a railroad company has been decided by this court. New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Co. v. Paterson, 32 Vroom 408.

The ordinance should be set aside, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mayor of Paterson
39 A. 680 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A. 47, 72 N.J.L. 112, 1905 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paterson-ramapo-railroad-v-mayor-of-paterson-nj-1905.