Paterson & Ramapo Railroad v. Mayor of Paterson
This text of 60 A. 47 (Paterson & Ramapo Railroad v. Mayor of Paterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The evidence in this case satisfies us that the point at which the proposed street crosses the railroad tracks is, properly speaking, a freight yard. There are side tracks, cars are unloaded and trains made up at this point, and it is used as a storing yard. All the tracks have been there and the present use has been continued for twenty-three years. That the city of Paterson has no authority to lay out a street across the freight yard of a railroad company has been decided by this court. New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Co. v. Paterson, 32 Vroom 408.
The ordinance should be set aside, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A. 47, 72 N.J.L. 112, 1905 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paterson-ramapo-railroad-v-mayor-of-paterson-nj-1905.