Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Paterek v. Petersen & Ibold

Paterek v. Petersen & Ibold

893 N.E.2d 519, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1450
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paterek v. Petersen & Ibold. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 Ohio St. 3d 503 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 2008·No. 2006-1811·Published

Opinion

Geauga App. No. 2005-G-2624, 2006-0hio-4179. Reported at 118 Ohio St.3d 503, 2008-0hio-2790, 890 N.E.2d 316. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

O’Connor and Cupp, JJ., dissent. James A. Brogan, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for O’Donnell, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paterek v. Petersen & Ibold, 893 N.E.2d 519, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1450 (Ohio 2008).

893 N.E.2d 519 (Paterek v. Petersen & Ibold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paterek v. Petersen & Ibold
118 Ohio St. 3d 503 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)