Patera v. Decorated Metal Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Patera v. Decorated Metal Manufacturing Co.

282 A.D. 883, 124 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5321

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 13, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 883 (Patera v. Decorated Metal Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patera v. Decorated Metal Manufacturing Co., 282 A.D. 883, 124 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover wage increases alleged to be due under an agreement to pay such increases in the event they were authorized by governmental agencies, it appears that between the time of the making of the alleged agreement and the official authorization of the increases, the appellants left the employ of the corporate respondent and ceased paying dues to the local union represented by the individual respondents. The appeal is from so much of the judgment entered after trial before an Official Referee as dismissed the complaint as to appellants. Judgment insofar as appeal is taken unanimously affirmed, with costs. 3STo opinion. Present — Rolan, P. J.,

Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover wage increases alleged to be due under an agreement to pay such increases in the event they were authorized by governmental agencies, it appears that between the time of the making of the alleged agreement and the official authorization of the increases, the appellants left the employ of the corporate respondent and ceased paying dues to the local union represented by the individual respondents. The appeal is from so much of the judgment entered after trial before an Official Referee as dismissed the complaint as to appellants. Judgment insofar as appeal is taken unanimously affirmed, with costs. 3STo opinion. Present — Rolan, P. J.,

Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 883, 124 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patera-v-decorated-metal-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1953.