Patel Vs. Patel

475 P.3d 767
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided November 13, 2020·No. 80000·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

KIRAN PATEL, No. 80000 Appellant,

vs.

MAHALAXMI PATEL,

Respondent.

FILED NOV 1 3 2020 El at 0- A. CLEF21 t.: Li COURT

4."

BY

HIEF LPUY CLERX

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Rena G. Hughes, Judge.

On March 16, 2020, this court issued an order removing this appeal from the settlement program and directing appellant to file a transcript request form by March 30, 2020, a docketing statement by April 6, 2020, and an opening brief or informal brief by July 14, 2020. When appellant failed to file these documents, this court issued an order on September 23, 2020, directing appellant to file the missing documents within 14 days. This court warned appellant that failure to comply may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. See NRAP 14(c); NRAP 31(d).

SUPREME COURT OF

le- qv, 41

NEVADA

(0) 1947A aatalm

To date, appellant has failed to file the missing documents or to otherwise communicate with this court. Accordingly, we conclude that appellant has abandoned this appeal and ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.1

Pan aguirre

g•ekAl2, , J.

Hardesty Cadish

cc: Hon. Rena G. Hughes, District Judge, Family Court Division Kiran Patel Mario D. Valencia Eighth District Court Clerk

'Respondent's motion to dismiss this appeal, filed on October 27, 2020, is denied as moot.

2

;AV

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patel Vs. Patel, 475 P.3d 767 (Neb. 2020).

475 P.3d 767 (Patel Vs. Patel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.