Patel v. United States of America
This text of Patel v. United States of America (Patel v. United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
RAJ K. PATEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-2383 (UNA) ) THE UNITED STATES, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff’s application for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The Court GRANTS the application and
DISMISSES the complaint.
Under the statute governing in forma pauperis proceedings, the Court is required to dismiss
a case “at any time” if it determines that the action is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court has reviewed plaintiff’s
complaint, as amended, and finds that its factual allegations, including assertions he received and
rejected an appointment as a federal judge, see Compl. ¶¶ 13-14, and that “sabotage,” id. ¶ 29,
caused him “to involuntarily become obese,” id., largely are incoherent, irrational or wholly
incredible. As such, the complaint is subject to dismissal as frivolous. See Denton v. Hernandez,
504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992) (“[A] finding of factual frivolousness is appropriate when the facts alleged
rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible[.]”); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319,
325 (1989) (“[A] complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions,
is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.”); Crisafi v. Holland, 655 F.2d
1 1305, 1307–08 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (“A court may dismiss as frivolous complaints . . . postulating
events and circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind.”).
The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the
complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as frivolous. An Order is issued separately.
/s/ JIA M. COBB United States District Judge DATE: August 11, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Patel v. United States of America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patel-v-united-states-of-america-dcd-2025.