Patel v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided September 23, 2016·No. 15-318·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-318V Filed: May 25, 2016 UNPUBLISHED

**************************** JAYMEENI PATEL, * * Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages; v. * Hepatitis A/Hepatitis B Vaccine; * Shoulder Injury Related to SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) * Respondent. * * **************************** Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, Rawls, McNelis and Mitchell, PC, Richmond, VA, for petitioner. Darryl R. Wishard, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On March 27, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as result of her Hepatitis A/Hepatitis B vaccine administered on April 11, 2012. Stipulation, filed May 25, 2016, at ¶ 4; see also Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months, and that she has received no prior settlement or award as compensation for this injury. Petition at ¶¶ 17-18; Stipulation at ¶¶ 4-5. “Respondent denies that “either vaccine caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged injuries or any other injury, and denies that petitioner’s current disabilities are the result of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on May 25, 2016, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

A lump sum of $129,837.34 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES CO URT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFI C E OF SPEC IA L MASTE RS

) JAYMEEN I PATEL, ) ) Petiti oner, ) No. I 5-3 I 8V ECF ) V. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ) STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipul ate to the fo llowing matters:

I. Petitioner, Jaymeeni Patel, fil ed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-I 0 to 34 (the "Vacc ine

Program"). The petition seeks com pensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner· s rece ipt

of the Hepati tis A/Hepatitis B vacc ine, which is conta ined in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C. F.R. § I 00.3(a).

2. On April 11 , 201 2, petitioner received the vaccine in her lefl arm. On April 23 ,

20 12, petitioner received a second vaccine in her left arm.

3. The vaccines were admini stered within the United States.

4. Petiti oner alleges that, as a result of rece ivin g th e vaccine on Apri I I I, 20 12, she

suffered from a shoulder inj ury related to vaccine administration, and that she experienced

symptoms of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no pri or award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of her alleged injuries.

6. Respondent deni es that the either vaccine caused or significantly aggravated

petitioner's alleged injuries or any other injury, and denies that petitioner's current disabilities

are the result of a vacc ine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated pos itions, the parties neverth eless now agree th at the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awardin g the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulat ion.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment re fl ecting a dec is ion consistent

with the terms o f this Stipul ation , and after petitioner has filed an election to recei ve

compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 I (a)( I), the Secretary of Health and Human

Serv ices will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum o f $ 129,837.34, in the form ofa check paya bl e to petitioner.

Th is amount represents compensation for all damages that would be avai lable under 42 U.S.C. §

300aa- I5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in th is case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive com pensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. Section 300aa-2 1(a)(I), and an application, the pa11ies will submit to further

proceed ings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in

proceeding upon this petition.

I 0. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipul ation is not for any items or services for whi ch the Program is not primaril y liabl e

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- I 5(g), to the ex tent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

2 expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance po licies, Federal or

State health benefits program s (other than Title XIX of th e Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patel v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2016).

Patel v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Patel v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-I
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-I
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a