Patel v. Park Plaza Hospital
866 S.W.2d 645, 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 2857, 1993 WL 417870
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 21, 1993·No. No. 01-92-01093-CV·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinions
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
The majority reaffirms its original decision, and overrules the motion for rehearing. We note that the officer’s return states the citation was delivered “by Rule 106.” We may properly consider the rule 106 order as being part of the face of the record in making our determination of whether the record reflects valid service of citation. Brown v. Magnetic Media, Inc., 795 S.W.2d 41, 43 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no writ).
COHEN, J., concurring.
OLIVER-PARROTT, C.J., dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patel v. Park Plaza Hospital, 866 S.W.2d 645, 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 2857, 1993 WL 417870 (Tex. Ct. App. 1993).
866 S.W.2d 645 (Patel v. Park Plaza Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pro-Fire & Sprinkler, L.L.C. and James C. Lankford v. the Law Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2021
Fred Norton D/B/A Austin Auto Sports v. Alfredo M. Lucio
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003