Patel v. Holder

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patel v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 707 F.3d 77
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided April 10, 2013·No. 12-1349·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 12-1349

NUPUR PATEL,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on February 1, 2013, is amended as follows:

On page 14, lines 9-11, replace "Consequently, we hold that the BIA erred in finding Patel removable, and need not decide whether he would be eligible for a waiver." with "Consequently, we hold that the BIA erred in finding Patel removable on the ground that the record of conviction revealed an intent to cause a permanent deprivation, and we need not decide whether he would be eligible for a waiver."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patel v. Holder, (1st Cir. 2013).

Patel v. Holder (Patel v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.