Patel v. Bonner
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6310
KAMAL PATEL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MACK BONNER; ABDUR RAHIM; BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:08-ct-03110-BO)
Submitted: January 19, 2011 Decided: April 11, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kamal Patel, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Huband, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kamal Patel appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Patel v. Bonner, No. 5:08-ct-03110-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28,
2010). We deny the motion to supplement the record and dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patel v. Bonner (Patel v. Bonner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.