Patel v. Bonner

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 11, 2011·No. 10-6310·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6310

KAMAL PATEL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MACK BONNER; ABDUR RAHIM; BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:08-ct-03110-BO)

Submitted: January 19, 2011 Decided: April 11, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kamal Patel, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Huband, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kamal Patel appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Patel v. Bonner, No. 5:08-ct-03110-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28,

2010). We deny the motion to supplement the record and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patel v. Bonner, (4th Cir. 2011).

Patel v. Bonner (Patel v. Bonner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related