Pate v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pate v. State

546 S.W.3d 623

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pate v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 554 S.W.3d 419 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 2018·No. No. ED 105414·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jermaine Pate ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*624The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jermaine Pate ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*624The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Pate v. State, 546 S.W.3d 623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

546 S.W.3d 623 (Pate v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.