Pate v. State

128 S.E. 819, 34 Ga. App. 172, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 113

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 20, 1925·No. 16464·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction, and there is no merit in the special assignments of error.,

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, 0. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pate v. State, 128 S.E. 819, 34 Ga. App. 172, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 113 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

128 S.E. 819 (Pate v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.