Pate v. Pate
This text of 113 S.E. 50 (Pate v. Pate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The fact that the deceased had made a will and had been intimidated into destroying it is not relevant, upon an application for administration upon the estate of the deceased, to negative the fact of intestacy; and such evidence was properly excluded.
2. Whore the applicant for appointment as administrator had been selected as such in writing by a majority of the heirs at law of the decedent (Civil Code of 1910, § 3943 (3)), he was as a matter of law entitled to the appointment, and a verdict to that effect was properly directed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 S.E. 50, 28 Ga. App. 798, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pate-v-pate-gactapp-1922.