Pate v. Pate
This text of Pate v. Pate (Pate v. Pate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DALE R. PATE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-1405
BRANDY L. PATE,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 14, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Karen Adams Foxman, Judge.
Dale R. Pate, Graceville, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED without prejudice to Appellant seeking relief pursuant to his sixth
motion for contempt.
COHEN, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pate v. Pate, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pate-v-pate-fladistctapp-2017.