Pate-Smith Co. v. Claflin Co.
This text of 64 S.E. 710 (Pate-Smith Co. v. Claflin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is apparent from an-inspection of the records and the questions made that the writs of error in these eases have been prosecuted for delay only, and for the purpose of preventing the prompt collection of a just debt. The points made are wholly without merit, and the judgments are affirmed, with damages for bringing the cases to this court for delay. Judgments affirmed, toith damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 S.E. 710, 6 Ga. App. 189, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pate-smith-co-v-claflin-co-gactapp-1909.