Pate-Smith Co. v. Claflin Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pate-Smith Co. v. Claflin Co.

64 S.E. 710, 6 Ga. App. 189, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 234

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 18, 1909·No. 1584; 1585·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

It is apparent from an-inspection of the records and the questions made that the writs of error in these eases have been prosecuted for delay only, and for the purpose of preventing the prompt collection of a just debt. The points made are wholly without merit, and the judgments are affirmed, with damages for bringing the cases to this court for delay. Judgments affirmed, toith damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

It is apparent from an-inspection of the records and the questions made that the writs of error in these eases have been prosecuted for delay only, and for the purpose of preventing the prompt collection of a just debt. The points made are wholly without merit, and the judgments are affirmed, with damages for bringing the cases to this court for delay. Judgments affirmed, toith damages.

Pate-Smith Co. v. Claflin Co., 64 S.E. 710, 6 Ga. App. 189, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 234 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

64 S.E. 710 (Pate-Smith Co. v. Claflin Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.