Pate Hotel Co. v. Blair

177 S.E. 330, 207 N.C. 464, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 496
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 12, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 177 S.E. 330 (Pate Hotel Co. v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pate Hotel Co. v. Blair, 177 S.E. 330, 207 N.C. 464, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 496 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Staoy, C. J.

It is provided by C. S., 2461, that every hotel or innkeeper who furnishes hotel accommodations to any person shall have a lien upon “all baggage or other property of such person . . . brought to such hotel” or inn, until all reasonable charges for such accommodations have been paid. The lien, however, would not attach to an automobile, the property of a third person, brought to the inn by the guest under circumstances disclosed by the present record. Covington v. Newberger, 99 N. C., 523, 6 S. E., 205; Cook v. Kane, 13 Or., 482, 51 Am. Rep., 28, and annotation.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Covington v. . Newberger
6 S.E. 205 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1888)
Cook v. Kane
11 P. 226 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 S.E. 330, 207 N.C. 464, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pate-hotel-co-v-blair-nc-1934.