Pate Hotel Co. v. Blair

177 S.E. 330, 207 N.C. 464, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 496
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 12, 1934·Published

Opinion

Staoy, C. J.

It is provided by C. S., 2461, that every hotel or innkeeper who furnishes hotel accommodations to any person shall have a lien upon “all baggage or other property of such person . . . brought to such hotel” or inn, until all reasonable charges for such accommodations have been paid. The lien, however, would not attach to an automobile, the property of a third person, brought to the inn by the guest under circumstances disclosed by the present record. Covington v. Newberger, 99 N. C., 523, 6 S. E., 205; Cook v. Kane, 13 Or., 482, 51 Am. Rep., 28, and annotation.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pate Hotel Co. v. Blair, 177 S.E. 330, 207 N.C. 464, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 496 (N.C. 1934).

177 S.E. 330 (Pate Hotel Co. v. Blair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Covington v. . Newberger
6 S.E. 205 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1888)
Cook v. Kane
11 P. 226 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1886)