Pate, Chadrick

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 16, 2011·No. PD-1504-10·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1504-10
CHADRICK B. PATE, Appellant


v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

ARANSAS COUNTY

Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b), 68.4(i), and 68.5 because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies, does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals, and grounds and reasons for review are longer than 15 pages.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.



Filed: February 16, 2011

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pate, Chadrick, (Tex. 2011).

Pate, Chadrick (Pate, Chadrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.