Patchoque Field Club, Inc. v. Davis

237 A.D. 890

This text of 237 A.D. 890 (Patchoque Field Club, Inc. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patchoque Field Club, Inc. v. Davis, 237 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. In the light of the circumstances, the tender on behalf of plaintiff of currency on December 31, 1928, was a good tender and established plaintiff’s readiness, willingness and ability to perform. This tender was a sufficient ratification of the exercise of the option by the plaintiff. (2 Morawetz Priv. Corp. [2d ed.] § 629.) If the appellant did not deem the currency tender to be wholly “ legal tender,” he should have given the plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to supply the same. (Cheney v. Libby,. 134 U. S. 68; Simmons v. Swan, 275 id. 113, 116.) We are also of the opinion that the tender of a deed by the appellant on December 31, 1928, was not made in good faith, and this court makes a new finding accordingly. Present — Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cheney v. Libby
134 U.S. 68 (Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patchoque-field-club-inc-v-davis-nyappdiv-1933.