Patchogue Bank v. Ambrose
This text of 278 A.D. 582 (Patchogue Bank v. Ambrose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action against the indorser of a demand promissory note, judgment for plaintiff reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The note was made August 13, 1947. It was presented for payment on July 8, 1949. Assuming that it was to have been paid at the monthly rate of $236.11, there was default for the first three months of 1948, and payment thereafter of an unexplained large sum in July, 1948, with nothing at all paid thereafter during the period of one year to time of presentment. In the absence of circumstances showing diligence on the part of the holder and a fair opportunity to the indorser to protect himself, and hearing in mind the fact that the burden of showing a reasonable length of time was on the plaintiff, the facts, insofar as disclosed at the trial, do not warrant the conclusion that the note was presented within a reasonable time, within the meaning of section 131 of the Negotiable Instruments Law. The pleadings and the contention of the defendant at the trial show that any technical deficiencies in the certificate of protest were waived. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 A.D. 582, 101 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patchogue-bank-v-ambrose-nyappdiv-1951.