Patanska v. Kuznia
145 A. 921, 104 N.J. Eq. 203
This text of 145 A. 921 (Patanska v. Kuznia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Patanska v. Kuznia, 145 A. 921, 104 N.J. Eq. 203 (N.J. 1929).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by YiceChancellor Fielder, and reported in 102 N. J. Eq. 408.
Fon affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Llotd, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Horton v. Horton
62 A.2d 503 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
In Re Bumsted
56 A.2d 725 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
145 A. 921, 104 N.J. Eq. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patanska-v-kuznia-nj-1929.