Patanska v. Kuznia

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Patanska v. Kuznia

145 A. 922, 104 N.J. Eq. 204, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 507

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 4, 1929·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 102 N. J. Eq. 408.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, -Parker, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, W,hite, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Kone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 102 N. J. Eq. 408.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, -Parker, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, W,hite, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Kone.

Patanska v. Kuznia, 145 A. 922, 104 N.J. Eq. 204, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 507 (N.J. 1929).

Pincite

145 A. 922 (Patanska v. Kuznia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related