Patalano v. Zoning Board of Review

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Patalano v. Zoning Board of Review

110 R.I. 940

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patalano v. Zoning Board of Review. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 R.I. 533 →

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided October 20, 1972·No. M. P. No. 1846·Published

Opinion

Representation having been made to the court that construction has been commenced by the respondents Ascio DeAndrade and Beatrice DeAndrade pending the determination of the petition for certiorari and, in view of respondents’ failure to file a memorandum in opposition pursuant to court rules, petition for certiorari granted the writ to issue forthwith.

Motion presented by the petitioner’s counsel for a stay of the order of the zoning board is denied without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Representation having been made to the court that construction has been commenced by the respondents Ascio DeAndrade and Beatrice DeAndrade pending the determination of the petition for certiorari and, in view of respondents’ failure to file a memorandum in opposition pursuant to court rules, petition for certiorari granted the writ to issue forthwith.

Motion presented by the petitioner’s counsel for a stay of the order of the zoning board is denied without prejudice.

Patalano v. Zoning Board of Review, 110 R.I. 940 (R.I. 1972).

Pincite

110 R.I. 940 (Patalano v. Zoning Board of Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.