Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pastoriza v. State

Pastoriza v. State

559 So. 2d 684, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2658, 1990 WL 48586
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 1990
DocketNo. 87-02396
StatusPublished

This text of 559 So. 2d 684 (Pastoriza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pastoriza v. State, 559 So. 2d 684, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2658, 1990 WL 48586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At sentencing the trial court departed upward from the recommended guidelines sentence and orally gave as a reason the appellant’s multiple violations of probation. This is a valid reason for departure. Williams v. State, 559 So.2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (en banc). However, no written reason for departure was filed. We, therefore, remand for resentencing and entry of a written order setting forth the reasons for departure in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll), if the trial court again departs.

Remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
559 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 So. 2d 684, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2658, 1990 WL 48586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pastoriza-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.