Pasternak v. Weiss

City of New York Municipal Court

Pasternak v. Weiss

28 Misc. 789, 59 N.Y.S. 1111

DecidedJuly 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Misc. 789 (Pasternak v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pasternak v. Weiss, 28 Misc. 789, 59 N.Y.S. 1111 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Hascall, J.

Only questions of law are involved in this appeal, and no facts can be considered by this court.

As to the amount of damages, if found to be excessive, we might, as a matter of law, consider the determination of the jury; but, as the case stands, the verdict should not be disturbed, as there is sufficient evidence to sustain it against all points raised by the appellant in her well-considered brief.

Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Conlan and Scotchman, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI