Paster v. Nagelsmith

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Paster v. Nagelsmith

30 Misc. 791, 63 N.Y.S. 154

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 Misc. 791 (Paster v. Nagelsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paster v. Nagelsmith, 30 Misc. 791, 63 N.Y.S. 154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff was suspended by force of chapter 16, section 243, of the Grand Lodge Laws, Knights of Pythias, by the mere fact that he was in arrears for three months’ dues. An affirmative action on the part of the defendant or of the Grand Lodge was unnecessary. He “ stood suspended ”, and by section 8 of article 5 of the by-laws of the Republic Relief Association, he. could receive no benefits until three months after his reinstatement.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff was suspended by force of chapter 16, section 243, of the Grand Lodge Laws, Knights of Pythias, by the mere fact that he was in arrears for three months’ dues. An affirmative action on the part of the defendant or of the Grand Lodge was unnecessary. He “ stood suspended ”, and by section 8 of article 5 of the by-laws of the Republic Relief Association, he. could receive no benefits until three months after his reinstatement.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Misc. 791, 63 N.Y.S. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paster-v-nagelsmith-nyappterm-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack