Pasta Chef, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pasta Chef, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

47 A.D.2d 713, 364 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8960

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 47 A.D.2d 713 (Pasta Chef, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pasta Chef, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority, 47 A.D.2d 713, 364 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this article 78 proceeding petitioner appeals from an order which denied, after reargument, its application to examine before trial two of respondent’s commissioners. The motion was brought pursuant to CPLR 3102 (subd. [f]). It should have been brought pursuant to CPLR 408 since this is a special proceeding and not an action. In either event the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying disclosure and we affirm its order. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term in article 78 proceeding to review denial of license.) Present — Moule, J. P., Simons, Mahoney, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this article 78 proceeding petitioner appeals from an order which denied, after reargument, its application to examine before trial two of respondent’s commissioners. The motion was brought pursuant to CPLR 3102 (subd. [f]). It should have been brought pursuant to CPLR 408 since this is a special proceeding and not an action. In either event the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying disclosure and we affirm its order. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term in article 78 proceeding to review denial of license.) Present — Moule, J. P., Simons, Mahoney, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 713, 364 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pasta-chef-inc-v-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack