Passow v. Superior Court

82 P.2d 615, 28 Cal. App. 2d 382, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 543
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Passow v. Superior Court. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Cal. App. 2d 89
California Court of Appeal·Decided September 7, 1938·No. Civ. No. 10894·Published

Opinion

NOURSE, P. J.

This is an original proceeding for a writ of mandamus to require the respondent court to assume jurisdiction of a motion for an injunction restraining one John Bell from disposing of his property for the purpose of defeating execution of a judgment against him in an action entitled Passow v. Bell. On the hearing on the return to the alternative writ issued herein it was conceded that the sole ground upon which a hearing of the motion was denied was that the superior court was without jurisdiction because the original case was pending on appeal. At the time this [383]*383ruling was made, the order in the case of Passow v. Bell had been reversed by this court (27 Cal. App. (2d) 360 [81 Pac. (2d) 224]), and a petition for a transfer to the Supreme Court was pending. Thereafter such petition was denied, and the remittitur to the superior court went down from this court on August 29, 1938.

There is no further obstacle to the assumption of jurisdiction over the motion for an injunction, and the respondent court may now proceed to hear the motion on its merits.

Let a peremptory writ of mandamus issue as prayed.

Spence, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Passow v. Superior Court, 82 P.2d 615, 28 Cal. App. 2d 382, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 543 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938).

82 P.2d 615 (Passow v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Passow v. Bell
81 P.2d 224 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)