Passonneau v. Cassens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Passonneau v. Cassens

25 A.D.3d 329, 805 N.Y.S.2d 833

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.3d 329 (Passonneau v. Cassens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Passonneau v. Cassens, 25 A.D.3d 329, 805 N.Y.S.2d 833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered July 12, 2005, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for a declaration that she is the rightful owner of the subject vehicle, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of declaring that Polly N. Passonneau, as attorney for Alexandra Cassens, is the rightful owner of the subject vehicle, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The March 29, 2004 letter agreement, read as a whole, plainly manifests the parties’ intention that ownership of the subject vehicle would be transferred to Ms. Passonneau as attorney for Alexandra Cassens. The letter agreement does not state that defendants were agreeing to reassign a lien on the vehicle, but rather, explicitly states that they agreed to reassign the vehicle to plaintiff. We modify only to the extent of declaring, in accordance with the letter agreement, that the transfer is to Polly N. Passonneau as attorney for Alexandra Cassens. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered July 12, 2005, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for a declaration that she is the rightful owner of the subject vehicle, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of declaring that Polly N. Passonneau, as attorney for Alexandra Cassens, is the rightful owner of the subject vehicle, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The March 29, 2004 letter agreement, read as a whole, plainly manifests the parties’ intention that ownership of the subject vehicle would be transferred to Ms. Passonneau as attorney for Alexandra Cassens. The letter agreement does not state that defendants were agreeing to reassign a lien on the vehicle, but rather, explicitly states that they agreed to reassign the vehicle to plaintiff. We modify only to the extent of declaring, in accordance with the letter agreement, that the transfer is to Polly N. Passonneau as attorney for Alexandra Cassens. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.3d 329, 805 N.Y.S.2d 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/passonneau-v-cassens-nyappdiv-2006.