Passmore v. State

902 So. 2d 173, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 982, 2005 WL 236017
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2005·No. No. 3D05-68·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Passmore v. State, 902 So. 2d 173, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 982, 2005 WL 236017 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

902 So. 2d 173 (Passmore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. State
817 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)