Passerman v. Judge of Recorder's Court of Detroit

307 Mich. 755
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 7, 1944·No. Calendar No. 42,641-½·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, a criminal sexual psychopathic person, seeks a writ of mandamus directing defendant to hear his petition which was denied as insufficient.

[756]*756In Re Rowan, 305 Mich. 231, we said:

“We interpret the provision (Act No. 165, § 7, Pub. Acts 1939 [Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 6991-7, Stat. Ann. 1943 Cum. Supp. § 28.967 (7)]) to he mandatory in this respect if jury trial is demanded by the petitioner within the time limited therein.”

To this we add: The statute requires that the petition must show a factual basis for the claim of full recovery.

Such showing not having been made, the writ of mandamus is denied.

North, C. J., and Starr, Wiest, Bittzel, Bushnell, Sharpe, Boyles, and Reid, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Passerman v. Judge of Recorder's Court of Detroit, 307 Mich. 755 (Mich. 1944).

307 Mich. 755 (Passerman v. Judge of Recorder's Court of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Rowan
9 N.W.2d 528 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1943)