Passavant v. Cantor

1 N.Y.S. 574, 48 Hun 546, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1448
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 18, 1888·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The careful opinion of the learned judge in the court below gives ample reason for the denial of the motion. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Passavant v. Cantor, 1 N.Y.S. 574, 48 Hun 546, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1448 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

1 N.Y.S. 574 (Passavant v. Cantor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Constable v. Hardenbergh
27 N.Y.S. 1022 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
Isaac v. Wilisch
23 N.Y.S. 589 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Faxon v. Ball
21 N.Y.S. 737 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Home-Maker Co. v. Alley
20 N.Y.S. 870 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892)