Passariello v. Lockovich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Passariello v. Lockovich

55 A.D.3d 892, 865 N.Y.S.2d 579

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.3d 892 (Passariello v. Lockovich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Passariello v. Lockovich, 55 A.D.3d 892, 865 N.Y.S.2d 579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Gigante, J.), dated August 13, 2007, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Fisher, J.P., Lifson, Covello and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Gigante, J.), dated August 13, 2007, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Fisher, J.P., Lifson, Covello and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.3d 892, 865 N.Y.S.2d 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/passariello-v-lockovich-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack