Passarella v. Vosburgh

209 A.D.2d 678, 619 N.Y.S.2d 680

This text of 209 A.D.2d 678 (Passarella v. Vosburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Passarella v. Vosburgh, 209 A.D.2d 678, 619 N.Y.S.2d 680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant John C. Kotarski appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated March 2, 1993, as denied the branch of his motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Examination of the record reveals the existence of triable issues of fact. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 678, 619 N.Y.S.2d 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/passarella-v-vosburgh-nyappdiv-1994.