Passalacqua v. Tomko
This text of 134 A.D.2d 961 (Passalacqua v. Tomko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted because plaintiff failed to meet the threshold of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Subjective complaints of the plaintiff without medical foundation are insufficient to establish a prima facie case of serious injury within the purview of the statute (Costa v Billingsley, 127 AD2d 990; Doyle v Erie County Water Auth., 113 AD2d 1016). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Henry, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 A.D.2d 961, 521 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/passalacqua-v-tomko-nyappdiv-1987.