Passaic Zinc Co. v. Spear

18 F. Cas. 1283, 32 Leg. Int. 362, 1875 U.S. App. LEXIS 1508

This text of 18 F. Cas. 1283 (Passaic Zinc Co. v. Spear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Passaic Zinc Co. v. Spear, 18 F. Cas. 1283, 32 Leg. Int. 362, 1875 U.S. App. LEXIS 1508 (circtedpa 1875).

Opinion

McKENNAN, Circuit Judge.

The decisive question in this case is one of fact, and it would be a superfluous task to collate and discuss the proofs touching it. It is sufficient to say that they satisfactorily show that the process described and claimed in the complainants’ patent was practiced by others some time before the date of the patent, and the period anterior to that, when the patentee claims to have discovered it.

The bill must, therefore, be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 1283, 32 Leg. Int. 362, 1875 U.S. App. LEXIS 1508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/passaic-zinc-co-v-spear-circtedpa-1875.