Pass v. D'Andrea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pass v. D'Andrea

30 A.D.2d 841, 292 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 841 (Pass v. D'Andrea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pass v. D'Andrea, 30 A.D.2d 841, 292 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries by plaintiff wife and for loss of services and medical expenses by plaintiff husband, plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 1, 1967 and made upon reconsideration, as adhered to the original decision denying a general trial preference. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and application granted. In our opinion, the uncontradicted facts are sufficient to warrant a verdict in excess of the jurisdiction of the Civil Court of the City of New York (Mahoney v. City Plumbers Supply, 25 A D 2d 565; Schiavone v. Laviano, 22 A D 2d 684; Brooks v. Williams, 19 A D 2d 827). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries by plaintiff wife and for loss of services and medical expenses by plaintiff husband, plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 1, 1967 and made upon reconsideration, as adhered to the original decision denying a general trial preference. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and application granted. In our opinion, the uncontradicted facts are sufficient to warrant a verdict in excess of the jurisdiction of the Civil Court of the City of New York (Mahoney v. City Plumbers Supply, 25 A D 2d 565; Schiavone v. Laviano, 22 A D 2d 684; Brooks v. Williams, 19 A D 2d 827). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 841, 292 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pass-v-dandrea-nyappdiv-1968.