Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 10, 2021·No. 192 EAL 2020 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

BRIANNA PASQUINI, : No. 192 EAL 2020 :

Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :

FAIRMOUNT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH : SYSTEM & UHS OF FAIRMOUNT, INC., : :

Petitioners :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Is a provider’s knowledge of a patient’s status as a registered sex offender, which may have been obtained from therapeutic communication with the patient, confidential under the MHPA and privileged pursuant to the psychiatrist/psychologist privilege?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets., (Pa. 2021).

Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets. (Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.