Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets.
This text of Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets. (Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
BRIANNA PASQUINI, : No. 192 EAL 2020 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : FAIRMOUNT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH : SYSTEM & UHS OF FAIRMOUNT, INC., : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Is a provider’s knowledge of a patient’s status as a registered sex offender, which may have been obtained from therapeutic communication with the patient, confidential under the MHPA and privileged pursuant to the psychiatrist/psychologist privilege?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pasquini-b-v-fairmount-behav-pets-pa-2021.