Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
BRIANNA PASQUINI, : No. 192 EAL 2020 :
Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :
FAIRMOUNT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH : SYSTEM & UHS OF FAIRMOUNT, INC., : :
Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Is a provider’s knowledge of a patient’s status as a registered sex offender, which may have been obtained from therapeutic communication with the patient, confidential under the MHPA and privileged pursuant to the psychiatrist/psychologist privilege?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets. (Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behav., Pets.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.