Pasquale v. Woodward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pasquale v. Woodward

250 A.D. 808, 294 N.Y.S. 202, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9074

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 250 A.D. 808 (Pasquale v. Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pasquale v. Woodward, 250 A.D. 808, 294 N.Y.S. 202, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order

entered in the office of the clerk of Saratoga county granting a motion on behalf of the defendant, city of Saratoga Springs, dismissing the complaint as to said defendant upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against said defendant. The complaint alleges that plaintiff was injured by a fall caused by a ridge of ice on the sidewalk in front of property of the defendants Woodward at 80 Marvin street, in said city; that the ice was caused by water flowing over the sidewalk, and conducted thereto over and along a concrete strip on said premises which slants downward to the sidewalk; which water fell from a roof to said concrete strip; that said ice was suffered and permitted by the defendants to remain thereon for a considerable period of time. Section 55 of the charter of the city provides: “ No action shall be maintained against the city for damages for injury to person or property sustained within the highways, unless it appear that a prior written notice of the particular place and condition where the injury occurred was given to the Commissioner of Public Works * * *; nor unless within thirty days after such accident a written notice of the particular time, place and cause of the accident, the nature of the injury and the amount of damage sustained, shall be served upon the city.” The complaint fails to allege the giving of either notice specified in said section. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See MacMullen v. City of Middletown, 187 N. Y. 37; Curry v. City of Buffalo, 135 id. 366; Root v. City of Saratoga Springs, 218 App. Div. 237; Gregorius v. City of Corning, 140 id. 701; McNally v. City of Cohoes, 127 N. Y. 350; Rice v. City of Mechanicville, 195 App. Div. 268.) Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order

entered in the office of the clerk of Saratoga county granting a motion on behalf of the defendant, city of Saratoga Springs, dismissing the complaint as to said defendant upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against said defendant. The complaint alleges that plaintiff was injured by a fall caused by a ridge of ice on the sidewalk in front of property of the defendants Woodward at 80 Marvin street, in said city; that the ice was caused by water flowing over the sidewalk, and conducted thereto over and along a concrete strip on said premises which slants downward to the sidewalk; which water fell from a roof to said concrete strip; that said ice was suffered and permitted by the defendants to remain thereon for a considerable period of time. Section 55 of the charter of the city provides: “ No action shall be maintained against the city for damages for injury to person or property sustained within the highways, unless it appear that a prior written notice of the particular place and condition where the injury occurred was given to the Commissioner of Public Works * * *; nor unless within thirty days after such accident a written notice of the particular time, place and cause of the accident, the nature of the injury and the amount of damage sustained, shall be served upon the city.” The complaint fails to allege the giving of either notice specified in said section. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See MacMullen v. City of Middletown, 187 N. Y. 37; Curry v. City of Buffalo, 135 id. 366; Root v. City of Saratoga Springs, 218 App. Div. 237; Gregorius v. City of Corning, 140 id. 701; McNally v. City of Cohoes, 127 N. Y. 350; Rice v. City of Mechanicville, 195 App. Div. 268.) Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 808, 294 N.Y.S. 202, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pasquale-v-woodward-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack