Pasqua v. Burns

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pasqua v. Burns

383 So. 2d 261, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16605

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 29, 1980

DocketNo. 79-1307

StatusPublished

This text of 383 So. 2d 261 (Pasqua v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pasqua v. Burns, 383 So. 2d 261, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16605 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in a damage action arising out of an assault and battery by an employee of appellant’s bar upon the appellee while in the bar.

We have considered the points on appeal in the light of the record on appeal and briefs and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See Texas Skaggs, Inc. v. Joannides, 372 So.2d 985 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Dade County v. O.K. Auto Parts of Miami, Inc., 360 So.2d 441 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Collard v. Keeton, 317 So.2d 121 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Forster v. Red Top Sedan Service, Inc., 257 So.2d 95 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); Sixty-Six, Inc. v. Finley, 224 So.2d 381 (Fla.3d DCA 1969); Sands v. Ivy Liquors, Inc., 192 So.2d 775 (Fla.3d DCA 1966); Hill v. Sadler, 186 So.2d 52 (Fla.2d DCA 1966); and Columbia by the Sea v. Petty, 157 So.2d 190 (Fla.2d DCA 1963).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in a damage action arising out of an assault and battery by an employee of appellant’s bar upon the appellee while in the bar.

We have considered the points on appeal in the light of the record on appeal and briefs and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See Texas Skaggs, Inc. v. Joannides, 372 So.2d 985 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Dade County v. O.K. Auto Parts of Miami, Inc., 360 So.2d 441 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Collard v. Keeton, 317 So.2d 121 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Forster v. Red Top Sedan Service, Inc., 257 So.2d 95 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); Sixty-Six, Inc. v. Finley, 224 So.2d 381 (Fla.3d DCA 1969); Sands v. Ivy Liquors, Inc., 192 So.2d 775 (Fla.3d DCA 1966); Hill v. Sadler, 186 So.2d 52 (Fla.2d DCA 1966); and Columbia by the Sea v. Petty, 157 So.2d 190 (Fla.2d DCA 1963).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

383 So. 2d 261, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pasqua-v-burns-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack