Pasol v. Pasol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pasol v. Pasol

213 A.D.2d 385, 624 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2477

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 385 (Pasol v. Pasol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pasol v. Pasol, 213 A.D.2d 385, 624 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated December 11, 1992, which, after a hearing, granted the defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff to pay the defendant $500 for an EKG machine, $825.58 in medical arrears, and $750 for counsel fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record on appeal does not contain the hearing minutes upon which the Supreme Court’s order was based. Therefore, this Court can discern no basis upon which to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated December 11, 1992, which, after a hearing, granted the defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff to pay the defendant $500 for an EKG machine, $825.58 in medical arrears, and $750 for counsel fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record on appeal does not contain the hearing minutes upon which the Supreme Court’s order was based. Therefore, this Court can discern no basis upon which to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 385, 624 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pasol-v-pasol-nyappdiv-1995.