Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pasley v. State

Pasley v. State

625 So. 2d 1303, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11187, 1993 WL 440267
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 2, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1767
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 625 So. 2d 1303 (Pasley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pasley v. State, 625 So. 2d 1303, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11187, 1993 WL 440267 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s convictions for both possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis and possession of cannabis with intent to sell violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. See Lundy v. State, 596 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Accordingly, appellant’s conviction for possession of more than 20 grams, of cannabis is reversed. In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

BARFIELD, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
700 So. 2d 190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
C.M. v. State
672 So. 2d 632 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Mosely v. State
659 So. 2d 1342 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Burke v. State
640 So. 2d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Palmer v. State
625 So. 2d 1303 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 So. 2d 1303, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11187, 1993 WL 440267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pasley-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.