Pasley v. State
625 So. 2d 1303, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11187, 1993 WL 440267
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 1993·No. No. 92-1767·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Appellant’s convictions for both possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis and possession of cannabis with intent to sell violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. See Lundy v. State, 596 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Accordingly, appellant’s conviction for possession of more than 20 grams, of cannabis is reversed. In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pasley v. State, 625 So. 2d 1303, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11187, 1993 WL 440267 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
625 So. 2d 1303 (Pasley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
700 So. 2d 190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
C.M. v. State
672 So. 2d 632 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Mosely v. State
659 So. 2d 1342 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Burke v. State
640 So. 2d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Palmer v. State
625 So. 2d 1303 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)