Paslay v. Martin

26 S.C. Eq. 351
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 15, 1853
StatusPublished

This text of 26 S.C. Eq. 351 (Paslay v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paslay v. Martin, 26 S.C. Eq. 351 (S.C. Ct. App. 1853).

Opinion

The judgment of the Court was announced by

Dunkin, Ch.

This appeal was submitted on the brief. So far as the Court can j udge from the statement of facts appearing in the Chancellor’s decree, and the brief furnished to the Court, his judgment is well sustained by the reasons which he has presented. The decree is therefore affirmed, and the appeal dismissed.

DargaN and Wardlaw, CC., concurred. JohNstoN, Ch., absent at the hearing.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.C. Eq. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paslay-v-martin-scctapp-1853.