Pasillas v. ICE Field Office Director

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided April 15, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-00681·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE

10 TEODORO PASILLAS, 11 Petitioner, Case No. C21-681-RAJ-MLP 12 v. PROPOSED ORDER 13 ICE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, 14 Respondent. 15 16 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L. 17 Peterson, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections or responses to that, and the remaining 18 record, the Court finds and ORDERS: 19 (1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. 20 (2) The Government’s motion to dismiss (dkt. # 7) is GRANTED in part and 21 DENIED in part. 22 (3) Petitioner’s habeas petition (dkt. # 4) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 23 (4) Petitioner’s request for release is DENIED. 1 (5) Petitioner’s request for a bond hearing is GRANTED. Within 30 days of the date 2 of this order, the Government shall provide Petitioner with a bond hearing that comports with the 3 procedural requirements of Singh v. Holder, 638 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir. 2011). 4 (6) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge

5 Peterson. 6 Dated this 15th day of April, 2022. 7 A

8 The Honorable Richard A. Jones 9 United States District Judge

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pasillas v. ICE Field Office Director, (W.D. Wash. 2022).

Pasillas v. ICE Field Office Director (Pasillas v. ICE Field Office Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vijendra K. Singh v Holder
638 F.3d 1196 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)