Pash v. Halko
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
STEPHANIE D. PASH f/k/a ) STEPHANIE D. HALKO, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D15-2957 )
DONALD A. HALKO, JR., )
)
Appellee. )
)
Opinion filed February 17, 2016.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert A. Bauman, Judge.
Keith Will Wynne of The Law Office of Keith Will Wynne, Plant City, for Appellant.
Ashley L. Sigrist and Eileen H. Griffin of Griffin & Associates, P.A., Brandon, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. However, the parties concede that paragraph 3 of the "ordered"
section of the order on appeal contains a scrivener's error. Accordingly, we remand so
that the order reflects counsels' stated agreement that the child, A.S.H., would time
share when he was willing to do so, but that the child, A.C.H., would follow (one (1) day
a week for four (4) hours).
Affirmed. Remanded to correct scrivener's error.
SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
185 So. 3d 713 (Pash v. Halko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.