Pash v. Halko

185 So. 3d 713, 2016 WL 634073
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 2016·No. 2D15-2957·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

STEPHANIE D. PASH f/k/a ) STEPHANIE D. HALKO, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D15-2957 )

DONALD A. HALKO, JR., )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 17, 2016.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert A. Bauman, Judge.

Keith Will Wynne of The Law Office of Keith Will Wynne, Plant City, for Appellant.

Ashley L. Sigrist and Eileen H. Griffin of Griffin & Associates, P.A., Brandon, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. However, the parties concede that paragraph 3 of the "ordered"

section of the order on appeal contains a scrivener's error. Accordingly, we remand so

that the order reflects counsels' stated agreement that the child, A.S.H., would time

share when he was willing to do so, but that the child, A.C.H., would follow (one (1) day

a week for four (4) hours).

Affirmed. Remanded to correct scrivener's error.

SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pash v. Halko, 185 So. 3d 713, 2016 WL 634073 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

185 So. 3d 713 (Pash v. Halko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.